For years, Adam Schiff has been banging the “Russian collusion” drum. Even as other Democrats moved on, this congressman even talked about it during the Senate impeachment trial.
He continued to push his assertion that, after numerous interviews over the years, he had “direct evidence” that Trump colluded with Russia. But where was that evidence?
Schiff has hidden the transcripts of these interviews for years. But now, they are coming out. And Schiff himself might be in hot water.
From Fox News:
Top law enforcement and intelligence officials affirmed they found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 election… citing transcripts of House Intelligence Committee interviews that have been cleared for release…
However, the numerous transcribed interviews could raise further questions about committee Chairman Adam Schiff’s past statements saying that there was “direct evidence” of collusion.
Well, well, well. What do we have here? The transcripts that Schiff often suggested “proved” Trump’s guilt now appear to totally clear his name.
Interviews conducted by Schiff’s committee over 2017 and 2018 have been kept from the public. Schiff pointed often to what he knew, saying he had “direct evidence” that Trump colluded with Russia.
His committee interviewed Donald Trump Jr., Steve Bannon, Jared Kushner, and other close Trump allies. Schiff made it seem, often, that he had the goods on Trump.
But now we are learning that officials “found no evidence” of collusion in these transcripts.
So what’s going on, Schiff?
Did the Democrat lie, again and again, when he said he had evidence? Why would he keep going along with this narrative, when top law enforcement and intelligence officials are saying they could not find evidence?
Think about it. If Schiff did have “direct evidence” that Trump and his campaign broke the law to collude with Russia, why isn’t Trump in jail? Why isn’t Donald Jr., Kushner, or anyone else in jail?
The question we should be asking now is, what was Schiff up to? Was he blatantly misleading America when he made these claims?
If so, he needs to answer for this. He stated frequently during the Senate impeachment trial that Trump needed to be removed, suggesting he’d “steal” the 2020 Election.
That’s a pretty bold claim. Schiff said it, based on his accusations of 2016 collusion.
So, was he lying under oath to the Senate? That would be pretty serious if it happened.
What we can say is that this should be enough to warrant an investigation into Schiff’s dealings. He’s made very big accusations against the President of the United States.
Accusations that may be crumbling right before our eyes.
SHARE if you want Adam Schiff investigated.
Source: Fox News
Author: Adam Casalino
Source: Patriot Journal: Report: New House Evidence Could Clear Trump – And Put Adam Schiff On The Russian Hotseat